If only DxO could change their approach of the documentation in this direction, I’m sure they would use the right tools to implement it.
After all, nobody is supposed to use DPL only when online.
#Dxo photolab 2 user manual pdf
Like zkark, for the software I’m using regularly, I use to have the PDF version of the documentation available on my phone or tablet in order to be able to access it even when I’m not online. However, the base problem is that DxO are considering that every DPL (or Nik) user is always online. I’m using the PDF converter embedded in MS Word and this one works correctly. Adobe April releases, DxO Photo Lab 5.2 are out, ON1 Resize AI preview Ricoh released Digital Camera Utility version 5.9.4 WiFi Commander for Pentax v1.7.0 released Venus Optics announced a new and updated Laowa 15mm f/4.5R Zero-D Shift lens for Pentax K mount Capture One 22 version 15.2. If would be nice if the technical writer in charge at DxO could write the original document in Word and give us access to it while still having the possibility to import it into ProProfs if they insist on using it. The only export choice seems to be PDF but their PDF translation module is really terrible, to say the least. Proprofs can import a Word document but AFAIK, it can cannot export to the Word format (if I’m wrong, I’d really like to have access to this Word version). The DxO PhotoLab 5 User Guide has all the answers. DxO PhotoLab is available for Windows and macOS, but I tested the Mac version in this review. So, the documentation is apparently not created as a standalone local editor but directly online. You can activate your DxO PhotoLab software on 2 computers (macOS and/or Windows) with the ESSENTIAL. DxO did not provide me with a special copy of the software in exchange for this review (I used the unlimited free 30-day trial), and they had no editorial input or oversight on any of the content. Proprofs documentation are created with an online, “MS Word"like”, editor. The online manual is generated using Proprofs. …but if the source is somehow MS Word or Adobe Acrobat compatible, I’m sure that some of us (and I for one) would volunteer to fix all these quirks and to produce a decent PDF
0 kommentar(er)
